Yunan ve İspanyol Lisans Öğrencilerinin Akademik Kütüphanecilik ile İlgili Kütüphanecilik Biliminin İçinde ve Ötesinde Bakış Açıları
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2019.751Anahtar Kelimeler:
Öğrenci anketi, kütüphane bilimi müfredatı, akademik kütüphanecilik akımları, kitlesel kaynak kullanım programıÖzet
Yeni bilgi uzmanlarının yetiştirilmesi ile ilgili kütüphanecilik ve enformasyon bilimi lisans programlarının yeterliliği, müfredat yapısı ve odağı hakkındaki karşıt görüşlerle süregelen tartışmaların konusu olmuştur. Bu bağlamda, devam etmekte olan doktora araştırmasının bir bölümünü oluşturan bu çalışma, akademik kütüphanecilerinin yeni rollerine ve işlevlerine etkin bir şekilde yanıt vermeleri için kütüphanecilik okul müfredatının nasıl geliştirileceğine ilişkin öğrencilerin görüşlerini analiz etmektedir. Araştırmacılar, merceği standart eğitim uygulamaların ötesinde pratik ve deneyime dayalı öğrenci bakış açısına tekrar odaklayarak, bir kütüphane bilimi öğrenci anketini pilot olarak test etmişlerdir. Karma metotlarla öğrencilerle ortak geliştirilmiş ölçme aracı, gelecek bilgi uzmanlarının küçük bir kendi kendine seçim örneği ile İspanya ve Yunanistan’da uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı öğrencilerin kütüphanecilik bilimi eğitimi ile ilgili algıları ve farkındalıklarına ilişkin kısıtlı araştırmalara katkıda bulunmaktır. Araştırma katılımcılarına değişen akademik kütüphanecilik çevresine ilişkin kendi kütüphanecilik okulu lisans programlarının uyumunu eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirme olanağı verilmiştir. Tanımlayıcı istatistiksel ve tümevarımlı tematik teknikler kullanılarak analiz edilen cevaplar kütüphane ve enformasyon bilimi müfredatının içeriği ile ilgili sınırlı bir akademik kütüphaneciliğin varlığının olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bunların da ötesinde, sonuçlar; üniversitede kütüphanenin rolünün güncellenmesi ile ilgili umutlar hususunda ihtiyatlı bir iyimserliğin, kütüphanecilerin gelecekteki rollerine yönelik bir bocalamanın, sistemin yeni bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin sunduğu fırsatları yakalama potansiyeli etrafında yaygın bir şüpheciliğinin altını çizmektedir. Bu araştırmanın değeri hem katılımcıların kavrayıcı yorumlarının çeşitliğinde hem de onları kütüphanecilik okul programının değerlendirme sürecine aktif katkı sağlayan katılımcılar yapan öğrenci onaylı ölçme aracı kullanımında yatmaktadır. Basmakalıp araştırma projelerinden farklı olarak bu girişim, program değerlendirme ve akademik kütüphanecilik paydaşlarının ihtiyaçları ile devamındaki uyumlaştırmaya farklı bir bakış açısı sunmaktadır.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
Abadal, E. (2015). The challenges of training in Library and Information Science. BiD: Textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, núm. 35. Retrieved from http://bid.ub.edu/en/35/abadal.htm.
Applegate, R. (2006). Student learning outcomes assessment and LIS program presentations. Journal of education for library and information science, 47(4), 324-336.
Audunson, R. (2005). The public library as a meeting place in a multicultural and digital context: The necessity of low-intensive meeting-places. Journal of Documentation, 61(3), 429-441.
Audunson, R. (2007). Library and Information Science Education—Discipline Profession, Vocation? Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(2), 94-107.
Baker, D. (2017). The end of wisdom? The future of libraries in the digital Age. In D. Baker, & W. Evans (Eds), The End of Wisdom? (pp. 1-37). Oxford United Kingdom: Chandos Publishing.
Beagle, D. (1999). Conceptualizing an information commons. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(2), 82-89.
Beagle, D. (2004). From information commons to learning commons. White paper presentation at the University of Southern California Leavey Library 2004 Conference on Information Commons: Learning Space Beyond the Classroom. https://www.academia.edu/3910575/From_Information_Commons_to_Learning_Commons
Beatty, S., & White, P. (2005). Information commons: models for eLiteracy and the integration of learning. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(1), 2-14.
Beckert, J. (2010). Institutional isomorphism revisited: Convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 150-166.
Bennett, S. (2009). Libraries and learning: A history of paradigm change. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 181-197.
Bikos, G., Papadimitriou, P. A., & Giannakopoulos, G. (2014). School libraries’ impact on secondary education: A users’ study. Library Review, 63(6/7), 519-530.
Bitter-Rijpkema, M. E., Verjans, S., & Bruijnzeels, R. (2011). The Library School: empowering the sustainable innovation capacity of new librarians. Library Management, 33(1/2), 36-49.
Blaschke, L.M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2015). Heutagogy, technology, and lifelong learning for professional and part-time learners. In A. Daily-Hebert, & S.D. Kay (Eds.), Transformative perspectives and processes in higher education (pp. 75-94). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Blin, F (2009). Europe: Academic Libraries. In I. Abdullahi (Ed.), Global Library and Information Science: A Textbook for Students and Educators. With Contributions from Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Latin America and the Carribean, the Middle East, and North America (Vol. 136, pp. 329-342). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Borrego, A. (2015). Library and Information Education in Europe: an overview. BiD: Textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, núm. 35. Retrieved from http://bid.ub.edu/en/35/borrego.htm.
Borup Larsen, J. (2005). A survey of library & information science schools in Europe. In L. Kajberg, & L. Lorring (Eds), European Curriculum Reflections on Library and Information Science Education (pp. 232-242). Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal School of Library and Information Science.
Boyd, R. (2008). Staffing the Commons: job analysis in the context of an Information Commons. Library Hi Tech, 26(2), 232-243.
Brine, A., & Feather, J. (2003). Building a skills portfolio for the information professional. New Library World, 104(11/12), 455-463.
Burkell, J. (2003). The dilemma of survey nonresponse. Library & Information Science Research, 25(3), 239-263.
Chain-Navarro, C., & Muñoz-Cañavate, A. (2009). Information science courses and the graduate job context in Spain. Education for information, 27(2-3), 115-126.
Cherry, J. M., Freund, L., & Duff, W. M. (2013). Students’ perceptions of information programs in Canada. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 54(3), 174-190.
Choi, Y., & Rasmussen, E. (2009). What qualifications and skills are important for digital librarian positions in academic libraries? A job advertisement analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(5), 457-467.
Chow, A.S., Shaw, T.L., Gwynn, D., Martensen, D., & Howard, M. (2011). Changing times and requirements: Implications for LIS Education. LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal,21(1). Retrieved from http://libres.curtin.edu.au/libres21n1/Chow_Shaw_Gwynn_Martensen_Howard_REF_LIBRES21n1.pdf
Combes, B., Hanisch, J., Carroll, M., & Hughes, H. (2011), ‘Student voices: Re-conceptualising and re positioning Australian library and information science education for the twenty-first century’. The International Information & Library Review, 43(3), 137-143.
Corrall, S. (2010). Educating the academic librarian as a blended professional: A review and case study. Library Management, 31(8/9), 567-593. Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/25123/1/Corrall_%282010%29_e-print.pdf
Creel, S. L., & Pollicino, E. B. (2012). Practitioners’& LIS students’ perceptions on preparedness in the New York metropolitan area. Education for Information, 29(1), 53-69.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publishing.
Creth, S, & Lowry, C. B. (1994). The Information Arcade: playground for the mind. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(1), 22-23.
Crockett, C., McDaniel, S., & Remy, M. (2002). Integrating services in the information commons: toward a holistic library and computing environment. Library Administration & Management,16(4), 181-186.
Dali, K., & Caidi, N. (2016). A two-way street: Building the recruitment narrative in LIS program. New Library World, 117(7/8), 499-539.
Dillon, A., & Norris, A. (2005). Crying wolf: An examination and reconsideration of the perception of crisis in LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 280-298.
European University Association. (2016). Public Funding Observatory 2016. Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from https://www.eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua%20public-fundingobservatory%202016.pdf
Ewell, P., & Wellman, J. (2007). Enhancing student success in education. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/Ewell_Report.pdf
Ferrer-Vinent, I. J., & Sobel, K. (2011). A study of master of library science candidates and librarians at a practicum site library. New Library World, 112(7/8), 365-376.
Georgy, U. (2011). Curricula development in library science: A nation-wide core curriculum? Education for Information, 28(2-4), 203-213.
Germano, M. A., & Stretch-Stephenson, S. M. (2012). Strategic value planning for libraries. The Bottom Line, 25(2), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880451211256405
Gerolimos, M., & Konsta, R. (2008). Librarians’ skills and qualifications in a modern informational environment. Library Management, 29(8/9), 691-699.
Giannakopoulos, G., Koulouris, A., & Kokkinos, D. (2014). Libraries in crisis: a glimpse over Greece and Cyprus. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,147, 411-417.
Goetsch, L. A. (2008). Reinventing our work: New and emerging roles for academic librarians. Journal of library administration, 48(2), 157-172.
González, Y. M., Rodríguez, C. T., Hilario, A. B. R., Olivera, L. H., & Castro, C. C. (2014). La inserción profesional de los graduados en Información y Documentación: el caso de la Universidad de Salamanca. BiD Textos universitaris de biblioteconomía i documentació, No 32. Retrieved from http://bid.ub.edu/es/32/martin2.htm
Goodsett, M., & Koziura, A. (2016). Are library science programs preparing new librarians? Creating a sustainable and vibrant librarian community. Journal of Library Administration, 56(6), 697-721.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Uppersaddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall
Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98-107.
Harvey, R., & Higgins, S. (2003). Defining fundamentals and meeting expectations: Trends in LIS education in Australia. Education for Information, 21(2-3), 149-157. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105825
Haycock, K. (2007). Education for library and information studies in Canada: A cross-cultural comparison. New library world, 108(1/2), 32-39.
Hildreth, C. R., & Koenig, M. (2002). Organizational realignment of LIS programs in academia: From independent standalone units to incorporated programs. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 126-133.
Hiller, S., Kyrillidou, M., & Self, J. (2008). When the evidence is not enough: Organizational factors that influence effective and successful library assessment. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 9(3), 223-230.
Horvat, A. (2003). Fragmentation of the LIS curriculum: the case of Croatia. New Library World, 104(6), 227-232. Retrieved from http://www.languagesdirect.co.nz/assets/files/Research_and_Advocacy/Library_Statistics-reflecting_yesterday_today_and_tomorrowNorthumbria_2005.pdf
Jantz, R. C. (2016). Managing creativity: The innovative research library. Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association.
Kajberg, L., Horvat A., & Oğuz, E.S. (2009). LIS education. In I. Abdullahi (Ed.), Global Library and Information Science: A Textbook for Students and Educators. With Contributions from Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, the Middle East, and North America (Vol. 136). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Lankes, R. D. (2011). The atlas of new librarianship. Cambridge. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Lawson, J., Kroll, J., & Kowatch, K. (2010). The new information professional: Your guide to careers in the digital age. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Mack, D. (2011). Libraries and museums. In an Era of Participatory Culture. Salzburg Global Seminar, Session 482 Report. Retrieved from https://www.salzburgglobal.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documents/2010-2019/2011/482/SessionReportPrint482.pdf
Malliari, A., & Matousidou, A. (2008). E apopse ton spoudaston tou Tmematos Bibliothekonomias kai Systematon Plerophoreses gia tis proptychiakes spoudes tous [Department of Librarianship and Information Systems student perceptions on their undergraduate studies], paper presented at the 17th Panellenic Academic Libraries Conference, Ioannina Greece, 2008. Retrieved from https://lekythos.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/10797/11409
Mathews, B. (2014a). Flip the model: Strategies for creating and delivering value. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1) 16–24.
Mathews, B. (2014b). Librarian as futurist: changing the way libraries think about the future. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(3), 453-462.
Mehra, B., Black, K., Singh, V., & Nolt, J. (2011). What is the value of LIS education? A qualitative study of the perspectives of Tennessee’s rural librarians. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 265-278.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Retrieved from http://www.theculturelab.umd.edu/uploads/1/4/2/2/14225661/mileshuberman-saldana-designing-matrix-and-network-displays.pdf
Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V., Chatzimari, S., & Tsafou, S. (2005). Changes in information society, changes in the education of information professionals. Paper presented at 14th Panhellenic Conference of Academic Libraries, 1-3 December 2005, Athens, Greece. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/10729/
Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2008). Library and information science education in Greece: institutional changes and current issues. Education for Information, 26(2), 85-100.
Montague, R., & Steadley, M. (2005). Multifaceted CPD: Developing a program to meet the diverse needs of LIS professionals. In P. Geroni, & G. Walton (Eds.), Continuing Professional Development - Preparing for New Roles in Libraries: A Voyage of Discovery, Sixth World Conference on Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning for the Library and Information Professions (pp. 180-191). IFLA Publications Series. Munich: K.G. Saur.
Mulvaney, P., & O’Connor, D. (2014). Rethinking how we rate and rank MLIS programs. Library Journal, 139(11), 37–40.
Muñoz-Cañavate, A., González, A. C., Hípola, P., & Miranda, E.A.C. (2017). Mailing lists on the internet-a collaboration tool that is still alive: The case of the rediris lists. Paper presented at International Conference on WWW/Internet 2017 and Applied Computing 2017; Vilamoura, Algarve; Portugal; 18-20 October 2017. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320616691_Mailing_lists_on_the_internet_-_a_collaboration_tool_that_is_still_alive_The_case_of_the_RedIris_lists
Muñoz’Cañavate, A., & Larios’Suárez, V. (2018). Los estudios de Grado en Información y Documentación en España. De los antecedentes a la situación actual: Una visión crítica. Transinformação, 30(3), 336-347.
Myburgh, S. (2003). Education directions for new information professionals. The Australian Library Journal, 52(3), 213-227. Doi: 10.1080/00049670.2003.10721549
Myburgh, S. (2005). The new information professional: How to thrive in the information age doing what you love. Oxford United Kingdom: Chandos Publishing.
Mylonas, P. (2017). Sectoral report: Turning Greece into an educational hub. National Bank of Greece. Retrieved from https://www.nbg.gr/greek/the-group/press-office/e-spot/reports/Documents/Education.pdf
Oakleaf, M. (2010). The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Ocholla, D. N. (2008). The current status and challenges of collaboration in library and information studies (LIS) education and training in Africa. New library world, 109(9/10), 466-479.
Ortiz-Repiso, V. (2015). Repensar els estudis de Biblioteconomia i Documentació a Espanya : traspassant els límits. BiD: Textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, núm. 35. Retrieved from http://bid.ub.edu/35/ortiz.htm.
Oyston, E. (Ed.). (2004), Centred on learning: Academic case studies in learning centre development, Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.
Pacios, A. R. (2015). From the library to the information commons: An approach to the model’s development in Spain. New Library World, 116(7/8), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-112014-0136
Partridge, H. L., Hanisch, J., Hughes, H. E., Henninger, M., Carroll, M., Combes, B., … Yates, C. (2011). Re-conceptualising and re-positioning Australian library and information science education for the 21st century (Final Report 2011). Sydney, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Paulin, D., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2016). Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Redefining e-learning practices through peer-generated approaches. The Information Society, 32(2), 130-142.
Pineau, N. (2011). Nouveaux espaces et nouveaux services. Bulletin de bibliothèques de France (BBF), 6, 115-116. Retrieved from http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2011-06-0115-003
Pruvot, E.B., Estemann, T., & Kupriyanova, V. (2017). Public Funding Observatory Report 2017’, European University Association, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from https://www.eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua-pfo-report-december-2017.pdf
Red de Bibliotecas Universitarias Españolas (REBIUN). (2003). Centros de Recursos para el Aprendizaje y la Investigación: Un nuevo modelo de biblioteca universitaria, Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, Madrid. https://slideplayer.es/slide/112652/
Sant-Geronikolou, S. (2017). Sempleontas sta nera proptechiakes kai senechizomenes vivliothekonomikes katartises: pros thiamorfose mias atzentas seneryatikes kainotomias [Co-navigating through library science undergraduate curricula and continuing professional development waters: towards the conceptualization of a collaborative innovation agenda]. Paper presented at the 23ο Panhellenic Academic Libraries Conference ‘’Academic Libraries: A roadmap to sustainability’’, 15-16 November 2017, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/31958/
Saunders, L. (2015). Academic libraries’ strategic plans: Top trends and under-recognized areas. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 285-291.
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in higher education, 44(4), 409-432.
Shank, J., Bell, S., & Zabel, D. M. (2011). Blended librarianship: [Re]envisioning the role of librarian as educator in the digital information age. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 51(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.51n2.105
Sinclair, B. (2009). The blended librarian in the learning commons: New skills for the blended library. College & Research Libraries News, 70(9), 504-507.
Tammaro, A. M. (2011). Library and Information Science (LIS) education: A conceptual framework towards” Europeisation. Journal of the Bangladesh Association of Young Researchers, 1(1), 1-13.
Tevaniemi, J., Poutanen, J., & Lähdemäki, R. (2015). Library as a partner in co-designing learning spaces: a case study at Tampere University of Technology, Finland. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 21(3), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1025147
Tsimpoglou, F. (2009). Ethnike politike gia bibliothekes, apousíes, sympleromatikotetes kai ypokatastaseis [National policy for libraries, absences, complementarities and substitutions]. Paper presented at 6th International Conference of the Committee for the Support of Libraries, 11-12 June 2009, French Institute, Athens. Retrieved from https://lekythos.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/10797/11742
Vassilakaki, E. (2017). New trends in higher education: Can information professionals rise to the challenge? In W. Evans, & D. Baker (Eds.), The End of Wisdom? (pp. 119-122). Oxford United Kingdom: Chandos Publishing.
Virkus, S. (2008). LIS education in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. In E. Pipp (Ed.), Informationskonzepte für die Zukunft: ODOK’07 (pp. 191-204). Graz-Feldkirch Austria: Neugebauer Verlag, GesmbH
Weiner, S. G. (2003). Resistance to change in libraries: Application of communication theories. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0022
Wiggins, A., & Sawyer, S. (2012). Intellectual diversity and the faculty composition of iSchools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 8-21.
Zins, C., & Santos, P. L. (2017). Content selection in undergraduate LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 58(3), 120-140
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
